Cultural Patterns of Gang Stalkers
-
The previous strategies and anchors could be changed to new ones by the stalkers in different area or region where the target moved in. However, they first exercise the previous ones since they received such information and data corrected by the previous stalkers.
-
Anchors are used no matter the cultural background that both the target and the gang stalkers are in. They rarely consider neither the cultural gap nor the frame of reference for anchoring.
-
Their claim can be anything that are negative.
-
Stalkers have three types: Authority – supervising the strategies and effectiveness, Foot Solders – actively working in street theater, anchoring, stalking, correcting information, and Supporters – who are participating their work by accepting their offer and agree to work in part of their strategy, yet this type does not have active role in the strategy.
-
NLP and LGAT are used among the foot solders. They are trained to use body languages, persuasion techniques, seducing techniques, etc.
-
Gang stalkers are really good in persuasion. They set up the same theme - “The target is a problem of ...” society, community, school, company, etc. Under this propaganda, anyone in the frame feel pressure and the need to support the propaganda.
-
In group persuasion, stalkers often confront to the target in groups or one member confront the target while others are observing in close distance. In such scenarios, the member often expresses something that provokes shame, confusion by telling lies as if it is normal in the frame, accusation on the falt of the target.
-
Gang stalker are not engaged in small chat. When they try to communicate with the target, they already have a purpose for either gaslighting or collect data/information desirable for their claim.
-
When the target communicate with the gang stalking member, they take the opportunity for persuasion and gaslighting.
-
When the individual member gets problem in his routine, often other members come and try to solve the problem while the member is removed from the scene.
-
They can mimic and participate in any religious or cultural theme, yet their understanding and motivation is shallow. Moreover, when the member acting like a part of religious group, he tries to avoid conversation about the religion if his appearance or behavior is questionable for the religious beliefs.
-
When they are engaged in a particular plan, they do not have flexibility of its goal. They might change the form of representation for alternative effect. In such situation, the members working in the plan know its goal and their own roles on it.
-
Their representation includes visual and sound 'cues' always. Thus, they try to enhance the desired outcome. The use of body language, tone of the voice, and other tools are used. By looking it as a frame, the situation shows how effective if you know their goal.
-
Both individual and group level, the gang stalkers are very sensitive about their performance in the community. For any small mistake, the whole group try to cover it up no matter how much it costs for the fixation.
-
When they commit crimes, they often make up an excuse for that. However, they do not have an excuse before the petit crime.
-
The need of turning down the target's claim is clear. It supposes to do with the original incident or cause that happened at the place where the original stalkers started working in their activities against the individual.
-
Their strategies are same in any region or country.
-
Their main goal for entire strategies are either trying to bring the target imprisonment or commit suicide. For the imprisonment purpose, they are engaged in unknown crime investigation while they claim the target crazy for alternative choice sending him/her to a mental institution. Just like the strategies of COINTELPRO, suicide is preferred as it will not reveal their crimes nor their contact with the target.
-
They feel that the target is their pray and must be removed from the area. Working on the strategies are to fulfil this purpose.
This list can be revised or updated in future.
14/12/07