Gang stalkers cannnot have the widsdom of crowd
According to James Surowiecki, group of people may work much efficiently than a highly skilled single individual. He published The Wisdom of Crowds in 2004. Since I do not have a chance to read the book, I share some information from the related page in Wikipedia. It says that Surowiecki explains that the crowd would fail to make a good decision, and states several cases. I think these cases are good examples to show the characteristics of gang stalkers. Also, I found out that the gang stalkers' behavior lacks anything to be a wise crowd to produce an excellent decision.
Failing characteristics:
1. Extrem homogeneity: The crowd has uniformed thought process or similar decisions. Gang stalkers work on same strategies everywhere in the world. No matter how the cultural back ground is different, they tend to use same strategy over and over. Their thought process is only focused on how to claim about the target.
2. Too much power on the center: If certain people try to dominate and control the crowd, the crowd cannot use their own unique abilities. Gang stalkers are foot solders collecting data and working on gaslighting and street theaters. Their bosses seem to stay in faraway office. Gang stalkers might receive command for their daily activities yet they may neither be fully understand nor work passionately for supporting their bosses work. Rather, they seem to work on what they are told to do.
3. Sectionalism: If information and other communication are not available among the crowd, they cannot work effectively. This may not the problem for the gang stalkers as they often communicate with other stalkers in public space. However, specially designed gaslighting or a street theater would cause a disfunctioning among the stalkers when something unpredictable happen during their routine jobs.
4. Extreme imitation: pressure from the peer and other emotional factor may destruct logical and scientific works. Gang stalkers are under the extreme peer pressure. They seem to be oppressed from their bosses.
Requirement to be a wise crowd:
1. Opinion diverseness: everyone has chance to speak up. Gang stalkers has opportunity to claim anything they want against target. In that point, they have diverse claims. However, what they lack is the ways to perform and achieve the goal. They spend too much time on same tricks.
2. Independence: no influence shape an opinion. Gang stalkers opinions are from others. They do not even have a single opinion without asking others to give them one.
3. Spreading: equality of opinions and knowledge sharing. Gang stalkers are working under the strict orders from their bosses and they do routine work.
4. Accumulation: one opinion can become a group thought. From the beginning, they are working together to claim the single or two statements. The target is either criminal or crazy.
09/01/08